SOME THOUGHTS ON ELECTION DAY
As the city in which I live and work, Pune, goes to
the polls tomorrow, and my native city, Bombay, goes to the polls next week, I
thought of writing a blog on the process of elections in a parliamentary
democracy. Of course, I must specify that I don’t vote myself, or to put it
more accurately, I cannot vote even if I want to, for my name does not for some
reason figure in the voter lists. As far as elections are concerned, I am thus
a persona non grata. I do believe, though, that given a choice there are
people who would like to see me disenfranchised for reasons I won’t go
into here.
A democracy is said to be a system of government for,
of and by the people. I have always been of
the view that there is something wanting in this definition. If nothing else,
the noun people needs to be qualified by an adjective, and that
adjective would have to be illiterate. So, a democracy, according to me,
is a system of government for, of and by illiterate people.
I mean no offence. Literally, a democracy does not
prescribe a minimum qualification for either those who contest elections, or
those who vote, and the government that thus comes to power is for everyone,
ranging from PhD holders to those who have never seen the inside of a school. In
other words, a democracy isn’t a meritocracy.
But the figurative or symbolic aspects of the word illiterate
are far more significant. In that respect, even a PhD holder can be
illiterate. And a cab driver—again, no offence meant—can be literate. And I
would call anyone illiterate who votes entirely on the basis of what the
government has done for them personally, rather than on the basis of what the
government has done for the nation as a whole, and for the Constitution, which
is the Bhagavad Gita of our parliamentary democracy.
What I mean is that is the voter voting only on the
basis of whether they are gainfully employed, affected by inflation, promised
freebies and cash money that will go into their bank accounts (not to speak of
illicit money doled out to them before elections to bribe them to vote for a
particular candidate), and so on? Or are they casting their vote after asking
themselves a series of worrying questions that would include:
Does my candidate belong to a political party that
understands and adheres to the Constitution?
Does the political party in question truly understand
the principles of a parliamentary democracy, or is it obfuscating the
distinction between a democracy on the one hand, and an autocracy and a
theocracy on the other?
Are the ideologues of the political party in question
the Great Dictators of the 20th century, Adolf Hitler in particular?
Is the federal structure of Indian democracy being
slowly eroded by the political party in question?
Likewise, are the secular credentials of our
Constitution being tampered with by the said political party? Does the
political party suffer from Islamophobia, Christianophobia and minoritophobia?
Does the political party that I’m voting for understand
the importance of checks and balances in the form of a free press, an
independent judiciary and bureaucratic agencies, and above all, a vibrant
opposition? Does it welcome, or is supercilious about criticism?
Does the political party stand for pluralism, or is it
obsessed with a series of Ones: One Nation-One Leader-One Party-One
Election-One Language-One Ideology-One Religion?
Is the political party quick to accuse its opponents
of scams, while resorting to bigger scams of its own?
Has the political party stooped so low as to break up
other political parties and blackmail their members to join it? Often by
threatening to arrest them on corruption charges?
Does the political party in question believe in the
dictum Bail is the Rule and Jail is the Exception? Or does it throw
people into prison right, left and centre, conveniently forgetting that there
is something called habeas corpus?
Is the political party, perhaps in a spirit of
competitiveness, matching the Emergency of 1975-1977 with an Undeclared
Emergency of its own?
And so on.
Many voters convince themselves that they’re voting
for a political party and its leader, although they are fully aware of its
misdoings, on the ground that there is no viable alternative in the country to
the said leader. This to my mind is a sure sign of illiteracy. I mean, no one,
I repeat, no one, is indispensable, whether in families, in multinational
corporations, or in the government. Don’t the patriarchs of families die? Do
their deaths mark the end of the family? Don’t the head honchos of multinational
companies retire? Does their superannuation mark the end of the company?
Similarly, rulers of nations come and go, but that doesn’t mark the death of
the nation. The nation, like life, goes on. To people who say to me, for
example, “Who, other than Modi?” my laconic answer is, “Well, whoever.”
The point is, heads of families, companies and nations
emerge when the need arises. Things don’t come to a standstill. Things don’t,
like a freight train, grind to a halt.
Actually, the seeming lack of a viable alternative is,
according to me, a good sign because it compels us to look for an alternative,
and in this way herald change. And change is any day preferable to maintaining the
status quo. If governments are intended to exist for life, why are elections in
democratic countries held every four or five years? When the Americans voted
Trump out of power and elected Joe Biden, they opted for change. When, in the
1970s, we in India voted Indira Gandhi out of power and brought in the Janata
Party, we opted for change. And when we in India in 2014 voted the Congress out
of power and brought in the BJP, we opted for change. So, now, ten years later,
isn’t it time for change again? The
dangers of not ushering change at the appropriate time are several. Rulers
begin to think they are invincible. Rulers become megalomaniacs. Rulers become sycophants
and encourage sycophancy. Rulers begin speaking nonsense. All these attributes
are more than apparent in the India of today.
And so, tomorrow, and the next week, when people go
out to vote, I would very much wish that they keep these things in mind before
getting their index fingers defaced with indelible ink, which they are supposed
to hold up as proof of the fact that they’ve voted, as if to say, Up Yours.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Dear readers,
Welcome to the stimulating world of Dr. R. Raj Rao's "Ruminations Unleashed"!
We invite you to actively engage in the transformative dialogue that this blog fosters.
Here are a few basic guidelines to ensure a respectful and enriching exchange of ideas:
- Politeness is paramount: Let's maintain a courteous tone while expressing our thoughts and opinions. Let's not demean the author or anyone else,
- Constructive criticism is welcome: We value your insights and perspectives. Feel free to share your thoughts on the blogs, highlighting areas for improvement or offering alternative viewpoints. Constructive criticism fuels intellectual growth and enriches the conversation.
- Maintain a mature approach: As readers of "Ruminations Unleashed," we expect you to bring your evolved opinions to the table. Express your ideas thoughtfully and respectfully, without resorting to crass or abusive language. Let's elevate the discourse together.
- Embrace holistic views: Engage with a broad-minded perspective, considering multiple facets of each topic. We encourage an inclusive and diverse range of opinions that contribute to a well-rounded understanding of the subjects discussed.
Keeping the above points in mind, let us all embark on a journey of enlightenment and collective wisdom. Thank you for being a part of "Ruminations Unleashed" your engagement is invaluable in shaping the transformative conversations that will unfold here!